VirtualBox

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

#20678 new defect

Keep opened and running each Virtual Display in each Monitor when the Guest is left to return to the Host

Reported by: manueljordan Owned by:
Component: GUI/multiview Version: VirtualBox 6.1.28
Keywords: Cc:
Guest type: Linux Host type: all

Description

I have in some laptops installed VirtualBox 6.1.28 r147628 (Qt5.6.2) where:

  • The Hosts are MacOS (El Capitan) and Windows (7 and 10)
  • The Guest is Ubuntu Desktop 20.04 for each Host.

The Guest Additions was installed through the .iso file. Therefore is possible:

  • Share directories copy/paste between the Host and Guest
  • Copy/paste between the Host and Guest

About the Display (Monitors). For each guest instance the configurations are:

Video Memory:  64MB
Monitor Count: 2
Scale Factor:  100%
Graphics Controller: VMSVGA

When Linux is the Guest, should VMSVGA be used . So I am assuming my current configuration is ok. I am able to get the 2 monitors configured, and based on extend. Furthermore was mandatory do the following:

  1. In the login screen do clic in the Settings icon and not use wayland
  2. Once logged go to Settings -> Displays -> Join Displays - the resolutions are based mostly according of the Host - it how reference

Problem: for any Host - when the Guest is running and applied the Host + F combination - I am able to see both monitors in full screen for each one. If I want return to the Host to do anything (I must use Host + F to return) - does not matter if the Host uses one/multiple desktop(s) - practically the 90% of times the secondary virtual monitor disappears automatically - so is mandatory do the point number 2 mentioned above. - How solve this?

What I expect is that when I left the Guest through Host + F the Guest still is running and each Virtual Display still must be opened in each Monitor where was assigned since the beginning. Then, when I return to the Guest and Host + F is used then each Virtual Display gets again the full screen of the Monitor where it was assigned

Change History (1)

comment:1 by Klaus Espenlaub, 3 years ago

The description doesn't get across what your observing and what you're expecting instead. I can see that you're trying to explain, but I don't follow (could be purely my fault, not seeing the obvious)... maybe a screenshot will help.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.

© 2024 Oracle Support Privacy / Do Not Sell My Info Terms of Use Trademark Policy