Custom Query (16363 matches)
Results (1237 - 1239 of 16363)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #6403 | obsolete | BindIP does not work for inbound NAT port-forwarded connections | ||
| Description |
Linux HostOS with multiple secondary IPs bound. 1.1.1.x are public/outside addresses in this example.
eth0 - primary hostos IP 1.1.1.1 Hostos has tcp/22 bound specifically to 1.1.1.1 with sshd using the "ListenAddress 1.1.1.1" directive in sshd_config. Now setting the guestos to bind to 1.1.1.2: VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/BindIP" "1.1.1.2" VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/Protocol" TCP VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/GuestPort" 22 VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/HostPort" 22 Then when trying to connect to ssh -p 22 1.1.1.2 connection is refused, and wireshark dump on the hostos shows it is being reset. Testing this by binding to tcp/23 for the guestos on the outside of the NAT: VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/Protocol" TCP VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/GuestPort" 22 VBoxManage setextradata "guest os" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/HostPort" 23 Now, ssh -p 23 1.1.1.2 works. However, ssh -23 1.1.1.1 is also being forwarded to the guestos, but is not what is expected due to the BindIP of 1.1.1.2. Hostos netstat reports guestos is binding ALL (0.0.0.0) tcp/23 connections. This should not be. For instance, should I want to bind 1.1.1.2:80 to guestosA and 1.1.1.3:80 to guestosB, you cannot, as the first guestos that starts will bind to all 0.0.0.0:80. The BindIP should limit what IP address the NAT's are bound to. |
|||
| #3085 | obsolete | Bitdefender 2009 Hogs CPU! | ||
| Description |
Problem starts when I installed Bitdefender Internet Security 2009. My CPU usage shoots though the roof with usage remaining between 90 and 100%. I will try other Anti-Virus Internet Security solutions but selling Bitdefender 2009 licenses and being generally satisfied with Bitdefender performance on normal machines I don't see this as my 1st course of action. I am also not convinced yet that this only applies to Bitdefender. Only testing alternative Virus software will tell. As I suspect this to be a bug, I assume others may experience the same issue and I believe this needs urgent investigation because Windows Products are useless for Internet connectivity without a proper Anti-Virus scanner. I am using OpenSUSE 11.1 on 2 machines, I installed Virtualbox 2.1.0 on both. Installed Windows XP 32 Professional on each which works as expected. Both machines use Host Interface Networking. I upgraded networking to Intel but PCNET Fast 3 produces the same error. I doubt that the problem listed below is a network problem as I disabled the interface at least once if I remember correctly in order to troublke shoot the issue. I tried various other settings to trouble shoot the problem. One machine uses Intel Core 2 Due CPU while the other use Intel Core 2 Quad CPU. One machine is a Green ASUS Rampage Formula Motherboard while the is a Intel DG965WH Motherboard. I have upgraded the ASUS board to the latest Factory Standing with Beta KDE 4.2 release but this makes no difference. Linux "top" command confirms CPU Usage as does the Windows XP Guest. I tried disabling as much as I could in Bitdefender but did not see any improvement. Processes that are hogging the CPU as per Windows XP Taskmanager are "bdagent.exe" @ +/- 90-100% and "vsserv.exe" @ +/- 1-5%. This is changing every second which suggest these processes are busy. The question is - Busy doing what? I am not running anything and if Bitdefender is not installed, the system is 95% idle. The Intel machine has Windows XP SP2 Installed. The Asus machine has Windows XP SP3 installed. I would appreciate if someboy could check this out to confirm my finding or point me in the right direction. I can try 64bit XP Pro but chose not to do so because early tests without anything revealed that 32bit XP outperformed 64bit XP on VirtualBox. I am aware that this should usually be the other way round and that was also my finding on VMWARE Server. I did however experience to many problems with VMWARE which were related to Virtual Machine Guests loosing time and Virtual Harddrive preformance being very sluggish. I need a Virtual machine that is faily responsive as it is my intention to use this for Pervasive Gateway and Perhaps MSQL Server for Software that does not support this in Linux. Any suggestions in the form of Links are appreciated! I will try Kasperski Internet Security and Bitdefender Anti-Virus to see if I can detect any difference. I am in need of a urgent solution as I have a couple setups which use VMWARE which I would like to convert by means of complete re-install but I don't want to swap one set of problems for others. Thanks! Best Regards Volker Bause
|
|||
| #4215 | duplicate | Black Screen / Graphics Glitches on VirtualBox 2.2.4 and Fedora 11 | ||
| Description |
I am having the same (or similar) problems to http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/2245 - namely that the VirtualBox window originally has no display at all, but still resizes (from BIOS to OS, and then from OS to full-screen). When I click on the "close" button, I can see the full screen in grayscale. When booted into the OS (in this case Windows XP SP3), graphics are heavily distorted and unreadable. Guest Additions are installed and are the latest version. |
|||

