Custom Query (16363 matches)
Results (922 - 924 of 16363)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1331 | obsolete | seamless mode straddles dual head monitors (windows guest - linux host) | ||
| Description |
Windowed mode and fullscreen both appear to work, although switching from one to the other requires going into the display properties and re-setting the display dimensions. I'm using archlinux, kernel 2.6.24-ARCH x86_64 with X.Org X Server 1.4.0.90, VirtualBox PUEL 1.5.6, an nvidia 8800GT driver version 169.07. This is a dual monitor (twinview) setup for a total combined resolution of 2560x1024. The seamless mode does not want to accept that and reverts to 1280x1024, situated in between both monitors. This leaves the outer halves of the two monitors unusable by any windows spawned within the VM. |
|||
| #650 | fixed | seamless mode gets geometry wrong -> fixed in SVN/1.5.2 | ||
| Description |
Linux host (Kubuntu 7.04)@1600x1200, Win XP guest 1280x1024. Switching to Seemless garbles the dekstop since VBox obviously doesn't get window dimensions right. Screenie here: http://www.vaultofsages.de/~dexterf/pub/seemless.png |
|||
| #8720 | obsolete | seamless mode fails while starting a snapshot | ||
| Description |
When (re)starting a snapshot that was taken while in seamless mode, the seamless mode does not work from time to time (but the default window-mode is entered). This also happens when we explicitly start in seamless mode doing both:
One way to (quite) deterministically reproduce this error is on a Windows XP host, to shut down Windows while VirtualBox is still running in seamless mode and rebooting Windows and starting the VM again. But this problem is not only limited to Windows XP hosts, it also appears within Windows 7 and Linux hosts. However, it is unclear when exactly it happens. Is there any workaround to *really* force the machine to startup in seamless mode? Are there any files which remain in an unclean state when VirtualBox is killed, instead of powered down via the API? |
|||

