Custom Query (16363 matches)
Results (298 - 300 of 16363)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #476 | fixed | PESpin protected programs crashes in WinXP guest | ||
| Description |
Programs protected with PESpin Protector, crashes in WinXP guest. It works on Virtualbox 1.3.8 ! |
|||
| #478 | fixed | Segmentation fault after creating a snapshot | ||
| Description |
I'm using Gentoo linux 2007.0 on an AMD64. I've tried this both with the open source and closed source versions I've created a virtual machine were I've successfully installed Windows XP. I've decided to create a snapshot, only to find that virtualbox will no longer run. So far I've manually edited the virtual computer configuration file and the virtualbox.xml file to delete the snapshot and then virtualbox starts again, until I try again to create a snaphot. I've also run VBoxSVC on the console and virtual box on another terminal under these circunstances, and found the following output: * innotek VirtualBox XPCOM Server Version 1.4.0 (C) 2004-2007 innotek GmbH All rights reserved. Starting event loop.... [press Ctrl-C to quit] Informational: VirtualBox object created (rc=00000000). Segmentation fault I'm attaching the computer definition file, and the virtualbox configuration file hoping it may be of any help. I'm keeping the files and configurations in case someone needs me to try anything or test a fix. |
|||
| #481 | fixed | Applications segfaults often on Mandrake Linux 9.2 guest | ||
| Description |
hi all ! Mandrake Linux 9.2 guest works :) ! Or kind of works... :( It's applications segfault very often. Especially "vi". KDE apps segfault sometimes. Kernel (2.4.22) didn't segfault. Host: Windows XP, VirtualBox 1.4.0 on Athlon XP, 1GB of RAM. Guest: Mandrake Linux 9.2 Mandrake Linux 9.2 download site: (5.7.2007) http://ftp.ale.org/pub/mirrors/mandrake/official/iso/9.2/i586/ Please check it. Overall, VirtualBox also have similar stability problems with some applications failing on Windows XP guest, such as DOSbox. See: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/241 Related-Offtopic: Is there any *universal* way to make virtualizers stable ? VMware stability is significantly highter than VirtualBox's - that's a fact - but why ? What magic they did on their product ? Can we do the same ? I thought hardware-virtualization (Vanderpool-capable CPU) is silverbullet, that makes things ultimately stable, but after testing KVM, I know that it's not true. It has it's own share of bugs. Can I help somehow ? -Alexey "Technologov" |
|||

